Notes for the UW infolit Community

August 26, 2008

Ithaka Report Generates Good Discussion of Library as Instruction/Learning Partner

Filed under: acrl, studies — mcsarah @ 2:01 pm

The new Ithaka Report is out.  According to a summary in the Chronicle of Higher Education, “[between 2003 and 2006], faculty members across the disciplines have shown a marked decline in how devoted they are to libraries as information portals. Eighty percent of humanities scholars are still devoted to library research—although that may be not because they’re traditionalists but because they can’t yet get what they need in digital form. But only 48 percent of economists and 50 percent of scientists value libraries as gateways.”  We could talk about the nuances of those findings all day.

But what I found even more interesting was that the Chronicle article linked to Stephen Bell’s commentary on ACRL’s blog.  Bell commented about The Question they Forgot to Ask, which is about the importance of libraries’ emerging instructional role.

Bell’s analysis has since been commented by both authors of the Ithaka study.  Roger Schonfeld clarified some questions about the data set and wrote, “I’ve made a note of your suggestion that we add a question about the learning partner role should we pursue a 2009 faculty survey. Through other research areas and our affiliated organization NITLE, we have an ongoing interest in the support of teaching and learning, and these surveys could do a better job of addressing these interests.”   Then Ross Housewright wrote “I took a look at the data to see how questions addressing the value of the library varied between faculty who self-reported seeing themselves as more of a teacher or as more of a researcher. In general, more faculty who considered themselves as primarily teachers felt that the role of the library had continuing importance than did those faculty who considered themselves primarily researchers.”  (for the full text see the comments to Bell’s post).   It’s really heartening that the authors of studies are reading the posts and taking the recommendations seriously and I hope there is a new study that takes on these questions.

August 13, 2008

Sifting and Winnowing

Filed under: Uncategorized — mcsarah @ 8:21 am

Hi all, I think the “Sifting and Winnowing” quote is a great tie-in to information literacy. For those who have some literary theory background, the quote has its problems (the idea of “The Truth” is kind of problematic; there are many truths). Still, perhaps we should use it more often in the future.

In preparing our talk for the New Faculty Orientation, I ran across this great retro photo of the plaque with a young woman that’s credited to the University Archives.

August 12, 2008

IT Strategic Planning: Early Priorities for Teaching/Learning and Outreach

Filed under: campus events, instructional technology, literacies, uw campus committees — mcsarah @ 10:16 am
Tags:

August 11, I attended the IT Strategic Planning event on Teaching/Learning and Outreach.  It would be great to see more librarians at these events so that we can share our perspectives and report back.  You can also participate by visiting the web site and giving your feedback.

This meeting was to provide feedback on an initial set of priorities; the full list will be posted on the web site in the notes section.  Items that are most related to information literacy include a focus on student and faculty technology competencies.  The purpose of the meeting was to provide feedback on an early draft of priorities related to teaching/learning and outreach.  The draft priorities for technology literacy on the flip chart read, “develop and support the technology skills of students/faculty and instructional staff,” but the handout for the session included some more nuanced language including technology literacy and competencies.

The discussion touched on models for accomplishing this and whether competencies could be defined at the campus level.  We discussed the Report of Raccreditation Team 4, which addresses competencies for global citizens and leaders and includes a section on information literacy written by a group of librarians.  Their team discovered that 80% of students take four courses in their freshman and sophomore years, so there’s an opportunity for integration there.  Although I can guess what those courses might be, I need to reread their report to be sure.

We also talked about “leveling the playing field” by providing a basic level of support/resources for teaching and learning across departments, as well as local access to support.

Blog at WordPress.com.